medicoll
1 post
Sep 10, 2026
2:24 AM
|
After completing MS, I am considering super-speciality training and currently comparing MCh vs DrNB.
I understand that admission requirements and available specialities can vary, but I am more interested in the practical differences between the two options.
For someone who wants strong clinical and operative exposure, what should be considered before selecting an MCh or DrNB programme? I am thinking about factors such as patient volume, number and variety of procedures, senior faculty, emergency workload, ICU support, and opportunities to manage patients independently.
Another question is about the long-term career. Does completing MCh give any clear advantage over DrNB when applying for consultant positions, or does the quality of training and individual experience matter more?
I am also interested in academic careers. If someone wants to work in a medical college later, should that influence the decision between MCh and DrNB?
I have seen different opinions online, so I would appreciate answers from surgeons or residents who have actually experienced either pathway.
If you were in this position after MS today, what would you compare before filling your choices?
|
To enhance your user experience on our website, this site uses cookies.
If you continue to browse, you accept the use of cookies on our site.
See our Privacy Policy
for more information.
